WHY THE QUEST FOR LNG (LIQUIFIED NATURAL GAS) WILL FAIL...

 

As the price of LNG spirals up, there will come a point when it sparks a crisis. The crisis will spark a broader economic conflict. China's approach to alternatives is well under way. 

'In March 2026, Iranian strikes on Qatar’s Ras Laffan and Mesaieed facilities triggered force majeure, halting roughly 17% of global LNG capacity for an estimated 3–5 years. The immediate beneficiary is obviously American liquefied natural gas exporters. U.S. terminals redirected flexible cargoes to premium European and Asian markets, driving spot prices higher and delivering windfall revenues to operators such as Cheniere, ExxonMobil and Venture Global. Yet this financial boon, measured in exchange-value terms - stock prices, export earnings, and GDP contributions - masks a deeper biophysical reality: the secular decline in Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROEI) across U.S. shale gas plays that underpin LNG. As reserves deplete and production shifts to lower-quality rock, the “stock” of gas can sustain gross flows into the early 2030s, but net-energy surplus erodes. By around 2035, many analysts project EROEI thresholds that render continued large-scale extraction energetically marginal.......Financial metrics tell a compelling story. Higher netback prices improved margins on spot and short-term cargoes, reduced cancellation risks, and lifted valuations for midstream and upstream players. Wall Street analysts projected multi-year revenue tailwinds, reinforcing America’s self-image as the “swing supplier” of global energy security. In SEV terms, this is pure exchange-value expansion: endogenous credit and futures markets mobilised capital to drill more wells and build more terminals, generating paper claims on future production. Yet the underlying use-value foundation - net energy delivered after subtracting extraction, processing and liquefaction energy costs - continued its long-term erosion........The U.S. shale-LNG case exemplifies divergence. Elevated global prices - driven by the Qatari outage - boost exchange-value metrics: revenues, share prices and export earnings. Financial markets treat LNG as a high-margin growth story. Yet the biophysical ledger shows rising energy intensity. More rigs, more diesel for drilling, more electricity for compression and more gas consumed in liquefaction; these all reduce net use value delivered to end-users. This gap widens via fictitious capital: futures contracts, leveraged infrastructure financing and ESG-tinted investment vehicles create claims on future energy far exceeding probable net output. As I argue in Thermoeconomics in a Time of Monsters, such decoupling is not market failure but an endogenous feature of mature, financialised hydrocarbon systems. Price signals that appear to reward efficiency actually subsidise entropy by incentivising marginal drilling rather than systemic redesign. This is also the basis of my argument that price caps are an insufficient - and potentially a wrong-headed response - to rising fuel costs......As detailed in my analysis, mature energy systems exhibit institutional and political inertia. Fictitious capital in real estate and finance threatened contagion in 2008; today, shale-LNG plays an analogous role, sustaining GDP optics while widening the gap between monetary claims and biophysical reality. The U.S. financialised model thus traps itself in a declining-EROEI loop, contrasting with systems that prioritise energetic augmentation through electrification and circular supply chains. The Qatar-induced LNG boom buys political and economic breathing room in certain respects, yet at the cost of accelerating the very entropy it seeks to outrun. Inflation’s effects are uneven, and those benefiting from rapidly rising prices do so at the expense of those being forced for pay these prices......The U.S. LNG “boon” buys time in a declining-EROEI treadmill: exchange-value metrics glow while use-value quality erodes, rippling costs domestically and globally, and locking in low-surplus infrastructure. China, by contrast, leverages the same disruptions to accelerate a higher-EROEI pathway. Electrification plus green hydrogen (per the 15th FYP and my analysis in “When Hydrogen Gets Cheap”) creates self-reinforcing coherence. Cheaper renewables lower electrolysis costs, enabling cheap hydrogen that further displaces oil/gas in industry and transport. This is thermoeconomic realism where monetary claims track energetic reality rather than diverging from it. The outcome is not just lower emissions but greater systemic resilience, industrial competitiveness and geopolitical leverage.

The U.S. shale-LNG largesse amid Qatari disruption is real in exchange-value terms. Yet thermoeconomics demands we interrogate the use-value ledger. Declining EROEI by 2035 in shale-LNG renders net returns unacceptable without ever-greater subsidies. China’s model - electrification and green-hydrogen ramp-up under the 15th FYP - offers the counter-example: coordinated alignment that turns shocks into surplus. As I concluded in “When Hydrogen Gets Cheap,” abundance arrives not through more drilling but through cheaper, higher-quality energy vectors. The monsters of our interregnum are thermodynamic. Only by prioritising use-value coherence over exchange-value arbitrage can societies sustain metabolic reproduction. The shale-LNG episode does not refute transition; paired with China’s trajectory, it reveals its urgency and feasibility. Gross flows may persist in the U.S., but net-energy quality - and strategic foresight - will ultimately govern what civilisations endure.



Popular posts from this blog

HOW EMPIRES FALL...

Image
  The USA is losing legitimacy precisely because of its oppression and repression. 'The empire faces a fatal dilemma: tolerating dissent weakens its central authority and fragments its cohesion, while repression, though temporarily effective, destroys its remaining legitimacy. It radicalizes populations, alienates allies and partners, and causes human, economic, and moral costs to skyrocket. Duroselle’s central paradox is clear: the more an empire attempts to ward off its demise through force, the more it accelerates its decline. Legitimacy—the invisible cement of domination—once lost, cannot be restored through coercion. Any attempt at rescue risks aggravating the problem and bringing the empire to an end. Trump’s policy follows in the footsteps of his predecessors, but his style and excesses are undoubtedly hastening America's loss of credibility on the world stage.'
Read more

THE IRAN WAR SO FAR - BY BIG SERGE...

Image
  Big Serge is the best military historian there is - and this is his analysis of the war on Iran so far. As a tangential point he fails to mention the global impacts of the attacks on Iran. One of the reasons that the NATO block doesn't want to get involved is that they think the war on Iran by Israel and the USA will not be successful and will draw attention away from Ukraine which is their No 1 priority. If the initial attack on Iran had 'worked' they would be fully behind damning the 'terrorist regime' (sic). But is has so-far failed. Serge is absolutely right in my view in maintaining that they key thing for the USA and Israel neo-fascists is the crippling of Iran so that it has massively reduced influence. How Iran reacts to this is the key thing. Will it seek closer links with Russia and China? One can only hope so. Will it go for a nuclear weapon? This is logical. Will it begin to assassinate political enemies in Isael and the USA? What (after all) is the di...
Read more

THE AGE OF 'ADMINISTRATIVE' POWER.

Image
Warwick Powell explains  how the administrative state has taken over in Europe... 'Regulatory authorities now determine which organisations qualify as legitimate civil society actors, which media outlets are “trusted,” which research bodies are acceptable partners and which narratives are “foreign-influenced.” These classifications carry decisive material consequences - access to funding, platforms and institutional recognition - yet are framed as neutral, technical assessments... Regulatory authorities now determine which organisations qualify as legitimate civil society actors, which media outlets are “trusted,” which research bodies are acceptable partners and which narratives are “foreign-influenced.” These classifications carry decisive material consequences - access to funding, platforms and institutional recognition - yet are framed as neutral, technical assessments.... In countries such as Georgia and Moldova, the EU has increasingly positioned itself not merely as an obser...
Read more