CHINA IS THE FUTURE

 

This short essay by Warwick Powell is crucial reading to understand what the future may be...


'There are moments when a society stops merely adapting to history and begins, instead, to make history in a new way. It does not just respond to inherited constraints; it reorganises the material conditions of life so that new possibilities become thinkable, practical and eventually normal. My proposition is that China, especially over the past decade and a half, has been doing precisely this. It has been building the future in plain sight.

I do not mean “the future” in the glossy, trivial sense of gadget fetishism or techno-utopian fantasy. I mean something more grounded and more consequential: the patient construction of a new energetic basis for economic life. In the language I have developed in my book, China has increasingly behaved as a thermodynamic state. That is to say, it has approached development not simply as a matter of GDP growth or industrial output, but as a long-term project of energetic renewal: improving the efficiency with which energy is produced, transformed, circulated, stored and used across the whole social metabolism.................crucially, this is not a story of naive substitution; of one fuel type for another in some one dimensional “transition” narrative. China’s development strategy has been far more sober and more dialectical than many of its critics allow. Coal has not disappeared. Rather, its role has been progressively altered. Cleaner and more efficient coal technologies have improved the performance of legacy systems, while in many cases coal has shifted away from the old ideal of permanent baseload dominance toward a more contingent standby function within a broader and increasingly renewable-heavy mix. Nuclear, too, has continued to develop, not as an ideological badge but as part of a pragmatic portfolio approach to energy security, decarbonisation and long-term reliability. And on the horizon sits fusion research, where China is again positioning itself not simply to catch up, but to help define what comes after the current renewables revolution.

This is worth pausing over. Too often, Western commentary on China swings between caricatures: either China is portrayed as a polluting relic because it still uses coal (and a lot of it), or as an industrial predator because it has become too good at producing the technologies needed for decarbonisation. The contradiction is revealing. What unsettles many critics is not merely China’s emissions profile, but the fact that China is increasingly shaping the material architecture of a post-oil future.......That, in the end, is what is most striking. China has not waited for a perfect future to arrive. It has been assembling it, piece by piece, inside the present. It has done so through factories and grids, via new batteries and platforms, expanding rail and renewables, and developing logistics systems and digital services, through materials science and statecraft. It has done so unevenly, imperfectly, and with contradictions, of course. No real historical process is otherwise. But the direction of travel is unmistakable.

China has been creating the future today: a future less organised around the combustion of ancient sunlight stored in oil, and more around the direct harnessing of contemporary flows from sun, wind and atom; a future in which data, infrastructure and energy form a more efficient web of life; a future in which development is not the privilege of a few core economies but can become more widely shared.

Others do not need to admire China uncritically to learn from this. They simply need the confidence to see what is already there. The future is no longer a distant abstraction. In important respects, it is already under construction. And China, more than any other country, has been showing what that construction looks like.'





Popular posts from this blog

HOW EMPIRES FALL...

Image
  The USA is losing legitimacy precisely because of its oppression and repression. 'The empire faces a fatal dilemma: tolerating dissent weakens its central authority and fragments its cohesion, while repression, though temporarily effective, destroys its remaining legitimacy. It radicalizes populations, alienates allies and partners, and causes human, economic, and moral costs to skyrocket. Duroselle’s central paradox is clear: the more an empire attempts to ward off its demise through force, the more it accelerates its decline. Legitimacy—the invisible cement of domination—once lost, cannot be restored through coercion. Any attempt at rescue risks aggravating the problem and bringing the empire to an end. Trump’s policy follows in the footsteps of his predecessors, but his style and excesses are undoubtedly hastening America's loss of credibility on the world stage.'
Read more

THE IRAN WAR SO FAR - BY BIG SERGE...

Image
  Big Serge is the best military historian there is - and this is his analysis of the war on Iran so far. As a tangential point he fails to mention the global impacts of the attacks on Iran. One of the reasons that the NATO block doesn't want to get involved is that they think the war on Iran by Israel and the USA will not be successful and will draw attention away from Ukraine which is their No 1 priority. If the initial attack on Iran had 'worked' they would be fully behind damning the 'terrorist regime' (sic). But is has so-far failed. Serge is absolutely right in my view in maintaining that they key thing for the USA and Israel neo-fascists is the crippling of Iran so that it has massively reduced influence. How Iran reacts to this is the key thing. Will it seek closer links with Russia and China? One can only hope so. Will it go for a nuclear weapon? This is logical. Will it begin to assassinate political enemies in Isael and the USA? What (after all) is the di...
Read more

THE AGE OF 'ADMINISTRATIVE' POWER.

Image
Warwick Powell explains  how the administrative state has taken over in Europe... 'Regulatory authorities now determine which organisations qualify as legitimate civil society actors, which media outlets are “trusted,” which research bodies are acceptable partners and which narratives are “foreign-influenced.” These classifications carry decisive material consequences - access to funding, platforms and institutional recognition - yet are framed as neutral, technical assessments... Regulatory authorities now determine which organisations qualify as legitimate civil society actors, which media outlets are “trusted,” which research bodies are acceptable partners and which narratives are “foreign-influenced.” These classifications carry decisive material consequences - access to funding, platforms and institutional recognition - yet are framed as neutral, technical assessments.... In countries such as Georgia and Moldova, the EU has increasingly positioned itself not merely as an obser...
Read more