Thucydides: A ruler who acts with virtue strengthens the state; one who rules through force alone invites resistance and disorder.

 This is a brilliantly written article that outlines the Chinese approah to development and diplomacy...it is bottled common-sense. Which is why China will avoid unnecessary conflict...


'....Thucydides’ History is ultimately a study in statecraft. It is a study in how leaders make decisions, how states navigate conflict, and how the interplay of power, perception, and judgment shapes outcomes. Far from being a crude realist manifesto, his work is deeply concerned with the role of phronesis (practical wisdom) in governance and the consequences of moral and strategic misjudgment........While Western strategic thought, especially as filtered through recent interpretations of Thucydides, often frames power transitions as inherently conflictual, Chinese statecraft draws from a very different historical and philosophical tradition. China’s leadership today approaches international relations with a perspective shaped by its long history of dynastic cycles, internal unification, and strategic philosophy, particularly from Confucianism, Daoism, and Legalism.

One of the most fundamental lessons drawn from Chinese history is that disorder (luan, 乱) is the greatest threat to governance, and the legitimacy of rule is tied to the maintenance of stability. The concept of the Mandate of Heaven (天命) underscores this: rulers maintain their legitimacy through effective governance and moral leadership, but when they fail, disorder follows, leading to their downfall. This historical consciousness informs China’s approach to statecraft, both domestically and internationally. Stability is prioritised over ideological confrontation, and the emphasis is on managing complexity rather than escalating conflict......Returning to Thucydides, the true lesson of his work, like China’s historical lessons, is that diplomacy and statecraft determine outcomes more than raw power. The Western appropriation of Thucydides as proof of (near) inevitable conflict leads to a self-fulfilling prophecy, while China’s leadership, drawing from its own historical experience, sees the world in terms of managing competition through long-term strategic patience. Ultimately, both Thucydides and Chinese historical thought emphasise that leadership is not about brute force but about understanding timing, perception, and the art of maintaining order amidst complexity.




Popular posts from this blog

THE AGE OF 'ADMINISTRATIVE' POWER.

Image
Warwick Powell explains  how the administrative state has taken over in Europe... 'Regulatory authorities now determine which organisations qualify as legitimate civil society actors, which media outlets are “trusted,” which research bodies are acceptable partners and which narratives are “foreign-influenced.” These classifications carry decisive material consequences - access to funding, platforms and institutional recognition - yet are framed as neutral, technical assessments... Regulatory authorities now determine which organisations qualify as legitimate civil society actors, which media outlets are “trusted,” which research bodies are acceptable partners and which narratives are “foreign-influenced.” These classifications carry decisive material consequences - access to funding, platforms and institutional recognition - yet are framed as neutral, technical assessments.... In countries such as Georgia and Moldova, the EU has increasingly positioned itself not merely as an obser...
Read more

CHINA....AND WESTERN 'LIBERAL ORIENTALISM'.

Image
  Warwick Powell argues that when we in the west look at China we do so in a patronising way he calls 'Liberal Orientalism'. In doing so we dismiss the Cultural Revolution as an aberration rather than a crucial break with the past. He contrasts China with India - the so-called 'worlds largest democracy' where the form of Government was inherited from British Colonialism and is chaotic. This raises the whole idea of governance. If the aim is effective government, India simply doesn't compare to China.  And so is western democracy the ONLY way in which good governance can be achieved? It clearly is not - especially in the days of mass propaganda dominated by wealth and associated corruption. What the festishisation of western democracy does is place 'democracy' above effective government. People are increasingly irritated by the so-called deomocratic process because it frequently fails to address their needs. 'Liberal Orientalism  differs from classical Or...
Read more