This is a good article that indicates why Labour is almost certainly holed beneath the water line. It mentions the appalling Peter Mandelsohn who I recall being introduced to by Charles Clarke who was President of the National Union of Students at the time, later to become aid to Niel Kinnock and ultimately a senior member of Blairs Cabinet - alongside Mandelsohn. It was at a Party sometime in the mid-70's. I immediately thought him 'affected' and 'creepy'. Was I right or was I right.

This article glosses over one thing - and that is the war in Ukraine which it only obliquely refers to as 'an outdated Atlanticist Foreign Policy'. Many who say they are on 'the Left' fail to understand that the real crisis of UK/US Imperialism is that it bit off more than it could chew in provoking the war. It is losing and that's why Trump wants out and why Starmer, in true ignorant form (along with Macron and Mertz) chooses to double down.

The result of Labour shifting is emphasis from class politics to identity politics is the neglect of the traditional base with the mass demonstration in London last weekend led by Tommy Robinson (!) and the increasing popularity of Farage and Reform.....

'For all Starmer’s faults, the underlying causes of the government’s catastrophic failures run far deeper than him. A combination of a structural crisis that they are unable and unwilling to address, and political commitments – to an ideological forever war on the left, to an outdated Atlanticist foreign policy, to a City of London-led economic model of extractive financialisation – prevents any real change and locks the government into the failing status quo.

To break with continuing decline requires breaking with the fundamental tenets of the four-decades-old clapped-out elite consensus: privatisation, public austerity and chasing after rightwing populism. This wider conversation on Britain’s broken political economy is almost entirely missing, banished to the far reaches of the left following the establishment counterinsurgency against Corbynism.




Popular posts from this blog

HOW EMPIRES FALL...

Image
  The USA is losing legitimacy precisely because of its oppression and repression. 'The empire faces a fatal dilemma: tolerating dissent weakens its central authority and fragments its cohesion, while repression, though temporarily effective, destroys its remaining legitimacy. It radicalizes populations, alienates allies and partners, and causes human, economic, and moral costs to skyrocket. Duroselle’s central paradox is clear: the more an empire attempts to ward off its demise through force, the more it accelerates its decline. Legitimacy—the invisible cement of domination—once lost, cannot be restored through coercion. Any attempt at rescue risks aggravating the problem and bringing the empire to an end. Trump’s policy follows in the footsteps of his predecessors, but his style and excesses are undoubtedly hastening America's loss of credibility on the world stage.'
Read more

THE IRAN WAR SO FAR - BY BIG SERGE...

Image
  Big Serge is the best military historian there is - and this is his analysis of the war on Iran so far. As a tangential point he fails to mention the global impacts of the attacks on Iran. One of the reasons that the NATO block doesn't want to get involved is that they think the war on Iran by Israel and the USA will not be successful and will draw attention away from Ukraine which is their No 1 priority. If the initial attack on Iran had 'worked' they would be fully behind damning the 'terrorist regime' (sic). But is has so-far failed. Serge is absolutely right in my view in maintaining that they key thing for the USA and Israel neo-fascists is the crippling of Iran so that it has massively reduced influence. How Iran reacts to this is the key thing. Will it seek closer links with Russia and China? One can only hope so. Will it go for a nuclear weapon? This is logical. Will it begin to assassinate political enemies in Isael and the USA? What (after all) is the di...
Read more

THE AGE OF 'ADMINISTRATIVE' POWER.

Image
Warwick Powell explains  how the administrative state has taken over in Europe... 'Regulatory authorities now determine which organisations qualify as legitimate civil society actors, which media outlets are “trusted,” which research bodies are acceptable partners and which narratives are “foreign-influenced.” These classifications carry decisive material consequences - access to funding, platforms and institutional recognition - yet are framed as neutral, technical assessments... Regulatory authorities now determine which organisations qualify as legitimate civil society actors, which media outlets are “trusted,” which research bodies are acceptable partners and which narratives are “foreign-influenced.” These classifications carry decisive material consequences - access to funding, platforms and institutional recognition - yet are framed as neutral, technical assessments.... In countries such as Georgia and Moldova, the EU has increasingly positioned itself not merely as an obser...
Read more